The_Elucidator
07-31-2007, 08:39 AM
July 31, 2007
Do Warming Advocates Care About Results?
By Debra Saunders (http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/author/debra_saunders/)
If you really believe that the planet is at the tipping point on global warming and the consequences will be fatal for people around the world, especially the poor, then all industrialized nations need to curb their greenhouse gas emissions. If the United States must sacrifice, so must China, which is fast emerging as the largest producer of industrial greenhouse gases on Earth.
Yet U.N. Secretary Ban ki-Moon, in a breakfast meeting with the San Francisco Chronicle editorial board Friday, suggested that industrialized nations -- read the United States -- have a "historical responsibility" to cut emissions, which are "almost to the saturation point," while China and India, two superpowers that were not bound to reduce emissions as part of the 1997 Kyoto global warming pact, "have their own positions."
-- snip --
And if results really were paramount, why aren't global warming advocates talking about the sacrifices necessary to meet their goal of 50 percent to 90 percent fewer emissions? Instead, they talk as if Americans can change their light bulbs, or drive a hybrid, not an SUV -- and that will do the trick.
It's as if they don't care about results, they only care if you believe.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2007/07/belief_not_results_matters_to.html
She hits it out of the ballpark on this article. Who cares what China and the other nations do...The US has a "responsibility" to do all the work and pay out the ass.
Sounds as if old Ban ki Moon is a Kofi clone... Hate America, hate Bush, blah, blah, blah...
Do Warming Advocates Care About Results?
By Debra Saunders (http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/author/debra_saunders/)
If you really believe that the planet is at the tipping point on global warming and the consequences will be fatal for people around the world, especially the poor, then all industrialized nations need to curb their greenhouse gas emissions. If the United States must sacrifice, so must China, which is fast emerging as the largest producer of industrial greenhouse gases on Earth.
Yet U.N. Secretary Ban ki-Moon, in a breakfast meeting with the San Francisco Chronicle editorial board Friday, suggested that industrialized nations -- read the United States -- have a "historical responsibility" to cut emissions, which are "almost to the saturation point," while China and India, two superpowers that were not bound to reduce emissions as part of the 1997 Kyoto global warming pact, "have their own positions."
-- snip --
And if results really were paramount, why aren't global warming advocates talking about the sacrifices necessary to meet their goal of 50 percent to 90 percent fewer emissions? Instead, they talk as if Americans can change their light bulbs, or drive a hybrid, not an SUV -- and that will do the trick.
It's as if they don't care about results, they only care if you believe.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2007/07/belief_not_results_matters_to.html
She hits it out of the ballpark on this article. Who cares what China and the other nations do...The US has a "responsibility" to do all the work and pay out the ass.
Sounds as if old Ban ki Moon is a Kofi clone... Hate America, hate Bush, blah, blah, blah...