aquapub
08-08-2007, 09:10 AM
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/...n3144730.shtml (http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/08/08/business/main3144730.shtml)
Obviously, the suggestion here is that the fines this company had receieved for safety violations didn't get them shut down because of their campaign contributions.
The mining company's number of citations were normal though, and if you go by CBS's logic here, all but a small fraction of reporters, anchors, news directors, and producers who give campaign contributions give to Democrats, so anything they say must give undue favor to Democrats right?
Better yet, most journalists we see every night use to work as partisan Democrat operatives before being trusted to disseminate legitimate news...but there's no conflict of interest in THAT right?
Obviously, the suggestion here is that the fines this company had receieved for safety violations didn't get them shut down because of their campaign contributions.
The mining company's number of citations were normal though, and if you go by CBS's logic here, all but a small fraction of reporters, anchors, news directors, and producers who give campaign contributions give to Democrats, so anything they say must give undue favor to Democrats right?
Better yet, most journalists we see every night use to work as partisan Democrat operatives before being trusted to disseminate legitimate news...but there's no conflict of interest in THAT right?