View Full Version : Orgasm of Pain
Wyatt_Junker
08-18-2007, 10:50 AM
I don't know where to put this, maybe anthropology but we don't have one of those. But I had a thought today: what would the world population be if instead of orgasms feeling good, they felt like someone striking your nuts with a hammer?
If we have 6 billion human beings cruising the Earth, how many would be deducted from that number if we were retrofitted with a spike strip that lined the genitalia that cinched up like a noose the moment of babymaking?
Would it be 3 billion? Half? Or less than half?
Babies would have to be very intentional creatures at that point, luxury items I suppose. No mistakes. Every child was a product of thought, intent and will.
You would have to want to be a parent really bad. It would be like voluntarily going on the midieval rack in order to get a family. I would imagine then, it would be the smart parents who knew that they had to keep the planet's population thriving. Perhaps there would be government involvment, incentives to keep nations relevant.
So, take the poll.
How far would the world population drop?
Wolfcounsel
08-18-2007, 12:39 PM
People will not make children if it involves pain. Don't confuse the pain of childbirth with the mythical pain of intercourse either. What type of human race is created after the normal one dies out is anybody's guess.
garlicguy
08-18-2007, 12:57 PM
Don't know about the population drop, but the price on the new models would go way the heck up. Greaat investment idea - maybe pass this along to Warren Buffet?
Wolfcounsel
08-18-2007, 02:13 PM
"Don't know about the population drop,..." --garlicguy
I'll bet a trillion to one the normal population will drop, to zero.
DoctorDoom
08-18-2007, 06:39 PM
Chances are it won't drop because it never would have grown. OTOH, if the premise is that the pain is a new phenomenon, we'd die out in a couple of generations (except for masochists).
DesertFox
08-18-2007, 07:20 PM
I'll bet a trillion to one the normal population will drop, to zero. But the lizzie population would continue unabated, using Steven Stills' squigglies at half-a-mil per.
TeenageRepublican
08-19-2007, 11:08 PM
I heard this from a very smart Conservative. He said "What most people don't realize is that the more the population grows, the more geniuses will grow with them."
I actually agree with this, the more population of course means more geniuses to solve the population problem. So, what are we worried about? :question:
DoctorDoom
08-19-2007, 11:33 PM
He said "What most people don't realize is that the more the population grows, the more geniuses will grow with them."Not necessarily. It's well known that intelligent, well-educated parents have fewer kids than average and below average parents. Ergo the shift is toward a lower average intelligence.
As unarguable evidence, consider the increase in the number of liberals in the general population since the 60s.
Look up CM Kornbluth's "Marching Morons".
Teenager
08-20-2007, 08:41 AM
Let's just say that suddenly this problem is a new phenomenon, and every human suddenly has this problem.
Scenario #1: I'm sure scientist would come up with a new "night of pill". This pill would totally numb all the parts of gentalia that feel pain, while letting the natural stimulations occur. However, this pill would take many years to create, and by that time a third of the population will have been wiped out.
Scenario #2: Modern countries begin "mass artificial insemination programs"(MAIP) in order to "preserve mankind." However, this precedure is so expensive that many of the modern countries economies begin to collapse because they can't afford free MAIP to every single mother, nor can they easily extract semen from males.
Meanwhile, 3rd world countries quit producing, and countries where AIDS is a problem just completely become extinct. This scenario cause 2/3rds of the world to be wiped out.
PrezLeefun
08-20-2007, 09:31 AM
I am not so sure.... I think the population would definately drop unless we could find a way to extract sperm not via ejaculation and then all pregnancy would happen in vitro.
Wolfcounsel
08-20-2007, 10:17 AM
"Scenario #2: Modern countries begin "mass artificial insemination programs"(MAIP) in order to "preserve mankind."" --Teenager
"...I think the population would definately drop unless we could find a way to extract sperm not via ejaculation and then all pregnancy would happen in vitro." --PrezLeefun
I'm assuming ejaculation without intercourse would not be painful here. The same for the female? A world of Onan.
There is a reason sex (heterosexual sex, not homo puppy-rubbing on the leg type) is pleasurable. It makes the human race continue. No way some artificial means of having children is going to produce any number of human resources to matter for the technology that will be present. What would be the use anyway?
About lesbians impregnating themselves (presumably with stored sperm), why?
Seabee
08-20-2007, 11:01 AM
"What most people don't realize is that the more the population grows, the more geniuses will grow with them."
This statement is very true, but lets not forget the black and white of the universe. The more geniuses we have is also a reflection on the number of dumbasses that are born. So in the end it balances out.
:question:
Franko
08-20-2007, 11:10 AM
Well at least the female doesn't bite off the head of the male after intercourse, now that would be a problem.
(that comes later during and after menopause)
Wolfcounsel
08-20-2007, 12:32 PM
"Well at least the female doesn't bite off the head of the male after intercourse, now that would be a problem." --Franko
Ever hear of Rodeo--never mind. Wrong forum.:evilgrin:
Eagle1
08-20-2007, 12:39 PM
the movie idiocracy is a funny take on that
TeenageRepublican
08-20-2007, 03:36 PM
[quote=Franko;576767]Well at least the female doesn't bite off the head of the male after intercourse, now that would be a problem.quote]
It depends if the male performed correctly, then she might bite his head off. :biggrin:
TeenageRepublican
08-20-2007, 03:39 PM
This statement is very true, but lets not forget the black and white of the universe. The more geniuses we have is also a reflection on the number of dumbasses that are born. So in the end it balances out.
:question:
How about we take the Liberal dumbasses, chop them up, and then we feed them to man-eating sharks. The rest of the dumbasses will go to "Happy Homes" (to be politically correct). That way, the geniuses can do their work.
Problem solved! :thumb:
vBulletin® v3.7.3, Copyright ©2000-2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.