NARAL Wants Rudy (Guess they don't believe he'll appoint "Constructionist" judges too

[HomeschoolrsRUs]

http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=MmFiZThiYjc1M2M4NTk4Zjg4NzMyMjQwMjk2OGE0Yzc=

NARAL Wants Rudy

In a phone interview with the Huffington Post (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2007/10/10/naral-prochoice-republi_n_67968.html), NARAL's political director Elizabeth Shipp acknowledged it "would help" the pro-choice movement if a Republican proved it was possible to win the presidency while still supporting abortion rights.

[Patriot Heart]

It wouldn't surprise me if the libs figured out that association with NARAL could be the nail in Rudy's coffin, we all know he is pro choice but he tries to keep it relatively quiet. The association with the NARAL killers would end that.

[Lazarus]

I wouldn't read too much into what some Lefties are saying about Rudy...

Im certainly not in the Rudy camp - That should be glaringly apparent - but I do believe he has a certain degree of integrity, even though I don't agree with some of his positions... If he says he intends to appoint strict constructionists, Im prepared to take him at his word until HE gives me a reason to doubt it...

Until I have evidence to suggest differently, I believe this is nothing more than sabbotage from the Left...

Still Im glad Homes posted it - we need to keep an eye on the nasty tricks coming over from the dark side...

[The_Elucidator]

Hitlery is good, real good! This isn't gonna be the last time we see crazy stuff like this either. We are already reading crap like POD posting stuff about FDT being anti-gun from the Soros backed Ron Paul.

[Jack_Savage]

It wouldn't surprise me if the libs figured out that association with NARAL could be the nail in Rudy's coffin, we all know he is pro choice but he tries to keep it relatively quiet. The association with the NARAL killers would end that.
It just shows how much they fear running against Rudy. Very transparent. Telling.

[Maggie_T]

Oh, yeah right! Like I believe for a minute that the bitches at NARAL will vote for Rudy over Hillary! :rolleyes:

As D4R says, this is so transparent. Hillary must be soiling that old navy blue pantsuit of hers at the thought of debating Guiliani.

Sorry NARAL. Nice try, but no cigar for you.

[The_Elucidator]

Sorry NARAL. Nice try, but no cigar for you.

Yeah, save it for Bill to use on interns. :biggrin: Thanks for the setup Maggie :thumb:

[Maggie_T]

http://foolstown.com/sm/rev.gif

I knew someone would latch on that. :devil:

[Venus de Smilo]

It wouldn't surprise me if the libs figured out that association with NARAL could be the nail in Rudy's coffin, we all know he is pro choice but he tries to keep it relatively quiet. The association with the NARAL killers would end that.
I agree. Does anyone really believe that NARAL prefers Rudy over Hillary???? I think they know he could possibly beat her so the move is on to discredit him by association with a group the right loathes.

[Venus de Smilo]

Hitlery is good, real good! This isn't gonna be the last time we see crazy stuff like this either. We are already reading crap like POD posting stuff about FDT being anti-gun from the Soros backed Ron Paul.
I hadn't heard Soros was backing Paul, but I have wondered where he's getting his money.

Got any details, links, etc.? If this can be verified, it should be communicated widely to the party.

If the Soros connection is true, is there a possibility Soros would back Paul as a third party candidate?

[The_Elucidator]

I hadn't heard Soros was backing Paul, but I have wondered where he's getting his money.

Got any details, links, etc.? If this can be verified, it should be communicated widely to the party.

If the Soros connection is true, is there a possibility Soros would back Paul as a third party candidate?

As of this moment I don't have "solid" proof; but it is just a matter of time before the money trail leads right back to him.. Book it.

With that being said; the Clintons are extremely predictable in one regard; their playbook. They know that Hitlery's "unfavorable" numbers are extremely high for this point in the game. They know that the only guarantee for her to get in is a third party run by a candidate that could peel off enough votes to get her in. Hubby did it with only 43%. My "guesstimation" is that she will garner at best 47% and that is with vote fraud. Her and her handler George will need a candidate that can keep FDT or Rudy under that.

I do see one major kink in the armor though. Paul is even more anti-war than she is, and it would behoove the GOP nominee to point that out to her anti-war constituency. But we know how the GOP PR machine performs; like a gas engine filled with diesel. :rolleyes: