Remortgage | Compare | Loans | Ugg | eBay
Ugly Clinton Rising [Archive] - FreeConservatives

PDA

View Full Version : Ugly Clinton Rising


DesertFox
11-18-2007, 08:55 AM
Kevin McCullough
Townhall.com
18 Nov 07

. . .

I remember the day George W. Bush was sworn in as President in his first term, I wondered allowed how he could stand to share the same car to and from the swearing in ceremony with the outgoing first "couple." I suppose that when the world came crashing down around us on September 11 one of the real benefits such tragedy left us with was that there was no need to be reminded any longer of the unseemly deceit, acts of marital infidelity, the brutal use of absolute power to bully the press, and worst of all having our leaders point their fingers at us and boldly tell us untrue things - merely to save their own hide. ...

In the years since Hillary has repackaged herself as the "moderate" Senator from New York thus further distancing herself from the trouble of the Arkansas days. But make no mistake - everything ugly associated with the word Clinton is back.

Rigged appearances, intimidation of the press, and the discovery that research hacks are even now sitting in some campaign office basement putting together strategy hits for the assassination of their current opponents - its all back.

More (http://www.townhall.com/columnists/KevinMcCullough/2007/11/18/ugly_clinton_rising?page=full&comments=true)

Maggie_T
11-18-2007, 12:04 PM
We should not be surprised, but we must walk through this election cycle with our eyes open.

Well, that's going to be a bit hard to achieve seeing as how Joe Doe and Missus tend to completely ignore what goes on in the country, unless it has to do with Angelina Jolie's new brown-skinned baby, or Britney Spear's latest self-destructive tantrum. Don't take my word for it. McCullogh himself pointed out here

... America yawned and went on its way.

Yes, Americans seems to do that a lot these days. Keep at it and all they're going to get for "their trouble" will be a Marxist government and a dislocated jaw. Oh, wait ... The Does don't have time to bother with politics, do they. They're busy earning a living, right? Bringing up baby, and all that. Well, enjoy while it lasts, is all I say. If The Bitch wins (or any of the other Marxists on the roster, for that matter), Mr. and Mrs. Doe will spend even more time yawning since they will be working for no one but Mr. Taxman, and baby will be seized ... oh, pardon me ... baby will be brought up exclusively by "the village."

But, hey, don't mind me. I'm just a cantankerous mean old bag who wants to deprive nice people of the next Oprah installment. :sulk:

And if we are not ready for the Hillary Police State (asbestos pantsuits required) then democratic primary voters best speak up and Iowa would be a great place to start.

Hah! Good luck with that one.

Wolfcounsel
11-18-2007, 12:08 PM
I wondered allowed how he could... --Kevin McCullough, from DesertFox's link

I wondered allowed? What in the heck does that mean?

PaulRevere
11-18-2007, 12:12 PM
wondered aloud.

Maggie_T
11-18-2007, 12:18 PM
Yes, I saw that. I cannot believe townhall editors let that one pass ... unless of course, they also think that's the way it's written. :eek:

TeenageRepublican
11-18-2007, 01:06 PM
Yes, I saw that. I cannot believe townhall editors let that one pass ... unless of course, they also think that's the way it's written. :eek:

You've got a point there. I got an entire manuscript sent back because I spelled foul "fowl".

DesertFox
11-18-2007, 01:13 PM
In one of the most learned books I've read, Kip Thorne's Einstein's Outrageous Legacy, twice in the space of two pages he has somebody "pouring over manuscripts." It happens.

You can't catch a homonym with a spell checker. You have to read with fresh eyes, meaning you have to let the manuscript sit awhile -- a coupla weeks -- while you do something entirely different. Then when you come back to it you see what you actually wrote as opposed to what you thought you wrote.

Nutrider99
11-18-2007, 01:16 PM
I got an entire manuscript sent back because I spelled foul "fowl".
There's a lot of fowl language coming from the democreeps lately. They all sound like chickens.

Timberwolf
11-18-2007, 02:12 PM
Yeah, and what they're spewing smells a whole lot like chicken****.

DoctorDoom
11-18-2007, 05:33 PM
You can't catch a homonym with a spell checker. Owed to a Spell Checker

I have a spelling checquer
It came with my pea sea
It plane lee marks four my revue
Miss steaks aye can knot sea

Eye ran this poem threw it
Your sure real glad two no
It's vary polished in it's weigh
My checker tolled me sew

A checker is a bless sing
It freeze yew lodes of thyme
It helps me awl stiles two reed
And aides me when aye rime

To rite with care is quite a feet
Of witch won should be proud
And wee mussed dew the best wee can
Sew flaws are knot aloud

And now bee cause my spelling
is checked with such grate flare
Their are know faults with in my site
Of nun eye am a wear

Each frays comes posed up on my screen
Eye trussed to be a joule
The checker poured o'er every word
To cheque sum spelling rule

That's why aye brake in two averse
By righting wants too pleas
Sow now ewe sea why aye dew prays
Such soft wear for pea seas

Maggie_T
11-18-2007, 05:57 PM
:lol: Let me guess. It was written by a liberal. :devil: