Best Credit Cards | La quiniela | News | Loans | Online Advertising
CNN waves white flag for Hillary [Archive] - FreeConservatives

PDA

View Full Version : CNN waves white flag for Hillary


DesertFox
11-18-2007, 09:35 AM
Judging by the reaction to Thursday night's CNN debate, everything seems to be falling into place for Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton's campaign for president. After flirting with subjecting her to some scrutiny, the media seem to be coming to the conclusion that her nomination as the Democratic presidential candidate is inevitable. The moderator, Wolf Blitzer, let Hillary off the hook on the issue of illegal immigration while luring Hillary's main competitor, Barack Obama, into a Wolf trap, and he stiffed candidate John Edwards on air time during the debate. It was Hillary's moment to shine, which is what CNN intended.

In contrast to Tim Russert's handling of the October 30 debate, at which Hillary virtually melted down under long-overdue tough questioning on the subject of illegal immigration, Blitzer gave her the kid-glove treatment. He had denied reports earlier in the week that he had been warned by the Clinton camp to not pull "a Russert" on Thursday night. But after watching his performance, you have to wonder. He permitted Hillary a brisk "No" when asked for her stand on driver's licenses for illegal aliens, whereas close scrutiny of her contradictory statements was in order. Instead, Blitzer sparred with Senator Barack Obama, who sounded almost like Hillary during the last debate. What's more, Blitzer did not actively discourage the audience from coming to Hillary's defense with audible sighs and moans when she came under attack by her rivals, especially John Edwards.

More (http://www.postchronicle.com/commentary/article_212115287.shtml)

Sarah
11-18-2007, 11:08 AM
It's amazing so many mindless buffoons support this woman.

d'urville
11-18-2007, 04:36 PM
Yeah, this is why CNN has long been accused of standing for "Clinton News Network" OR "Communist News Network", same thing.


CNN hits bottom and digs: All six debate questioners appear to be Democratic Party operatives. So much for "ordinary people, undecided voters".

To paraphrase Junior Soprano, CNN is so far up the DNC's hind end, Howard Dean can taste hair gel.

In a nutshell, CNN's six "undecided voters" were:

A Democratic Party bigwig
n antiwar activist
A Union official
An Islamic leader
A Harry Reid staffer
A radical Chicano separatist


LINK (http://directorblue.blogspot.com/2007/11/cnn-plants-questions-to-protect-hillary.html)

Official response from CNN: That's news to us!

DoctorDoom
11-18-2007, 04:57 PM
The shameless, obsequious fawning over that ho by the DBM is becoming puke-inducing. She has yet to commit herself on anything. Her gang of hitbeasts go on the attack if anyone dares to ask a question more pointed than what color drapes she wants in the Oval Office. Tim Russert was a rare exception, and the vitriol hurled at him has been contemptible.

We had eight years of the Klintoons. Another eight will destroy the country.

jayson
11-18-2007, 05:12 PM
The good news is that a lot of young liberals (I have many friends who fit this mold) are outraged at this. They hate Clinton as much as many red staters, and this was just a slap in the face to any one expecting a "fair and balanced" debate.

This will ultimately hurt Clinton more than help her. But in the meantime, the stupid masses will lap this up.

DesertFox
11-18-2007, 05:20 PM
I don't think so. The Clinton koolaid drinkers will lap it up because they'll think it showed that The Big He's still running things, but nobody was fooled by that farce.

Maggie_T
11-18-2007, 05:51 PM
It's amazing so many mindless buffoons support this woman.


Yes, that's a good description for Wolf Blitz and all the rest of the morons at CNN.