Credit Cards | Xbox Mod Chips | Prison Break | Masini | Mobile Phones
NAACP Suit Against Gun Makers Dismissed [Archive] - FreeConservatives

PDA

View Full Version : NAACP Suit Against Gun Makers Dismissed


oracle
07-21-2003, 11:50 AM
<font>NAACP Suit Against Gun Makers Dismissed (http://customwire.ap.org/dynamic/stories/N/NAACP_GUN_LAWSUIT?SITE=DCTMS&amp;SECTION=HOME&amp;TEMPLATE =DEFAULT)</font>

NEW YORK (AP) -- A federal judge dismissed the NAACP's case against handgun makers Monday, ruling that the group showed gun retailers were careless but failed to prove that its members were uniquely harmed.

The NAACP proved its members "did suffer relatively more harm from the nuisance created by the defendants through illegal availability of guns in New York," U.S. District Judge Jack Weinstein wrote in a 175-page decision.

"It failed, however, to show that its harm was different in kind from that suffered by other persons in New York," Weinstein added.

Despite ruling against the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, the judge found that its lawyers had established "clear and convincing evidence" that gun retailers are guilty of "careless practices."

Manufacturers take too few measures, he wrote, "to eliminate or even appreciably reduce the public nuisance they individually and collectively have created." Among the "obvious steps," he said, would be requiring retailers to ban multiple sales to the same customers.

...


Click here to read more (http://customwire.ap.org/dynamic/stories/N/NAACP_GUN_LAWSUIT?SITE=DCTMS&amp;SECTION=HOME&amp;TEMPLATE =DEFAULT)

2nd_Amendment
07-21-2003, 11:52 AM
While it's good to see it dead the stupidity is obvious. Regulation is contingent upon the BATF, not on the manufacturer anymoreso than it is upon an auto maker to regulate whether the purchaser of a Corvette has the skills to drive it at the limits of its envelope, or the purchaser of a '92 Buick is too old to operate anything at all...

FatherTime
07-21-2003, 11:53 AM
It all comes down to who is the person behind the register asking questions and getting to know the person with the money.

Secondly, the crimes commited with legally owned handguns is such a small fraction, more drunk drivers kill people each day than are killed with legally owned handguns.

Go figure.

-FT

DesertFox
07-21-2003, 12:01 PM
[ QUOTE ]
<font color="red">Manufacturers take too few measures, he wrote, "to eliminate or even appreciably reduce the <font color="blue">public nuisance<font color="red"> they individually and collectively have created."</font>

[/ QUOTE ]

Manufacturers do not create a <font color="red">public nuisance. <font color="blue">They make guns. People create, and are, the public nuisance. </font>

ThomasIsUnderrated
07-21-2003, 12:01 PM
yup

Dash_Riprock
07-21-2003, 01:44 PM
Gotta get them "respirations" from the white man.

There was a time in black communities that being a criminal or having one in your family was a cause to feel shame. Now, the arrogant rap mentality has taken hold. Blame anything but the individual responsible. Shame is for the weak. Shame means "actin' all humble." Shame means accurate accountability. Shame means acceptance of personal failure.

Can't have any of that.

That same thing happened with the black beach balls who tried to sue McDonald's for making them fat.

Must be a bitch to have to work for a living.

DoctorDoom
07-21-2003, 02:06 PM
[ QUOTE ]
The NAACP proved its members "did suffer relatively more harm from the nuisance created by the defendants through <u>illegal</u> availability of guns in New York," U.S. District Judge Jack Weinstein wrote in a 175-page decision.

[/ QUOTE ]

<center><font size="7" color="crimson">ILLEGAL</font></center>

Main Entry: 1 il·le·gal
Pronunciation: (")i(l)-'lE-g&amp;l
Function: adjective
Etymology: Middle French or Medieval Latin; Middle French illegal, from Medieval Latin illegalis, from Latin in- + legalis legal
Date: 1538
: not according to or authorized by law : UNLAWFUL, ILLICIT; also : not sanctioned by official rules (as of a game)

Can people be that frigging clueless naturally, or does it require an eight-year advanced degree in stupidity? Leave it to the liberaloonies to sue a company for the illgal use of its products. I fully expect to see Ginsu sued when a nutcase filets someone with one of it's knives.

IMO, the judge is a bench vegetable for not throwing the case out.

DesertFox
07-21-2003, 02:09 PM
This point is cleverly made in the cartoon oracle posted the other day.

A meeting of Lefties decides to write letters to the people of Iowa, in order to get their agenda out. Someone asks if he can ask a stupid question and the group leader sez there are no stupid questions.

The question is then put: "Why are we writing to foreigners?"