Synchronization fast and easy | Problem Mortgage | First Time Home Buyers | Loans | Best Credit Cards
Why Spitzer was Bushwhacked [Archive] - FreeConservatives

PDA

View Full Version : Why Spitzer was Bushwhacked


DeclinetoState
03-19-2008, 09:14 PM
:bsflag:

By F William Engdahl

The spectacular and bizarre release of secret FBI wiretap data to the New York Times exposing the tryst of New York State governor Eliot Spitzer, the now-infamous client "No 9", with an upmarket call-girl had relatively little to do with the George W Bush administration’s pursuit of high moral standards for public servants. Spitzer was likely the target of a White House and Wall Street dirty tricks operation to silence one of the most dangerous and vocal critics of their handling of the current financial market crisis.

A useful rule of thumb in evaluating spectacular scandals around prominent public figures is to ask who might want to eliminate that person. In the case of former governor Eliot Spitzer, a Democrat, it is clear that the spectacular "leak" of the government's FBI wiretap records showing that Spitzer paid a
<TABLE id=Table7 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width=667 border=0><TBODY><TR><TD width=1></TD><TD vAlign=top width=513>high-cost prostitute US$4,300 for what amounted to about an hour’s personal entertainment, was politically motivated.

The press has almost solely focused on the salacious aspects of the affair, not least the hefty fee Spitzer apparently paid. Why the scandal breaks now is the more interesting question.

Spitzer became governor of New York following a high-profile record as a relentless state attorney general going after financial crimes such as the Enron fraud, and corruption by Wall Street investment banks during the 2002 dotcom bubble era. Spitzer made powerful enemies by all accounts. The former head of the large AIG insurance group, Hank Greenburg, was among his detractors. He was bitterly hated on Wall Street. He had made his political career on being ruthless against financial corruption.

Most recently, from his position as governor of the nation’s second largest state, home to its financial industry, Spitzer had begun making high-profile attacks on the complicity of the Bush administration in covertly arranging bailouts of its Wall Street friends at the expense of ordinary homeowners and citizens, all paid for by taxpayer funds.
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>More (http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Global_Economy/JC20Dj04.html)

DeclinetoState
03-19-2008, 09:22 PM
This could be a topic for another thread, but do we need yet another Spitzer scandal thread? We probably already have too many.


By Annalee Newitz (http://www.alternet.org/authors/2188/), AlterNet (http://www.alternet.org/). Posted March 19, 2008 (http://www.alternet.org/ts/archives/?date[F]=03&date[Y]=2008&date[d]=19&act=Go/).

<!-- end: byline --><!-- end: headline and byline --><!-- start: teaser -->
Eliot Spitzer's decision to pay money for sex was personal. It's not like he issued a policy of mandatory hookers for everybody.

The outrage over former New York governor Eliot Spitzer hiring an A-list hooker makes me feel like throwing a gigantic, crippling pile of superheavy biology and economics books at everyone in the United States and possibly the world. Are we still so Victorian in our thinking that we think it's bad for somebody to pay large amounts of money for a few hours of skin-time with a professional? Have we not learned enough at this point about psychology and neuroscience to understand that a roll in the sheets is just a fun, chemical fizz for our brains and that it means nothing about ethics and morality?

The sad fact is that we have learned all that stuff, and yet most people still believe paying money for sex is the equivalent of killing babies on the moral report card. And yet nobody bothers to ask why, or to investigate past the sensational headlines. As far as I'm concerned, the one unethical thing Spitzer did was to hire a sex worker after prosecuting several prostitution rings. That's hypocritical of him, and undermines my faith in him as a politician.

But let's say Spitzer hadn't prosecuted so-called sex crimes before, and all he was doing was hiring a lady for some sex. Here is what I don't get: why is this bad? On the scale of things politicians can do -- from sending huge numbers of young people to be killed in other countries to cutting programs aimed at helping foster kids get lunch money -- hiring a sex worker is peanuts. It's a personal choice! It's not like Spitzer was issuing a statewide policy of mandatory hookers for everybody.

What really boggles the mind is the way so-called liberal media like National Public Radio and the New York Times have been attacking Spitzer's morals as much as the conservative Fox News types have. In some cases, they've attacked him more. The reasons given are always the same: sex work is abusive to women (male prostitutes don't exist?), and being paid for sex is inherently degrading.
More (http://www.alternet.org/sex/80247/)

DeclinetoState
03-19-2008, 09:36 PM
In a speech he delivered on election night, Eliot said: “In a Spitzer administration, the road to responsive and responsible government will begin on Day One. It is a promise based not on false hopes or foolish pride, but on a simple notion of government that has been lost amid the bickering and partisanship of the last few years: the idea that if we work to give everyone the same opportunity — that if we ensure everyone plays by the rules — there is no limit to what we can achieve as a people.” [Emphasis added]
Gov Bio (http://www.ny.gov/firstfamily/spitzerbio.html)

DoctorDoom
03-20-2008, 07:01 AM
Bushwhacked??? OMG, it's Bush's fault. I just KNEW it!

DeclinetoState
03-20-2008, 07:38 AM
Spitzer made an issue of how important it was for everyone to play by the rules. He chose not to do so himself. IOW, he made his bed . . .

Kathekon
03-22-2008, 08:31 AM
If Spitzer were not a total prick with no friends, Democrats might be more inclined to pursue some silly argument that Dick Cheny and Karl Rove sat up nights listening to Spitzer wiretaps with a SWAT team on 24-7 standby. And did so to serve their masters on Wall Street.

This was not done by any anti-terrorist units. There were warrants. Spitzer was not charged first -- he outed himself when he discovered that the records for Client #9 were seized. Bill Clinton would have waited and then lied like a champ. Spitzer clearly does not have what it takes to be a Democratic nominee.

I hope the moonbat left does try to make Spitzer a victim hero.