Credit Cards UK | New York Hotel | Mortgage Calculator | Credit Cards | Online Loans
The Hillary Democrats, by Pat Buchanan [Archive] - FreeConservatives

PDA

View Full Version : The Hillary Democrats, by Pat Buchanan


Maggie_T
05-09-2008, 09:52 AM
I'm not a Buchanan fan, not by a long chalk. But I think he's got something here.


The Hillary Democrats
by Patrick J. Buchanan (http://www.humanevents.com/search.php?author_name=Patrick J.+Buchanan)

She cited an Associated Press article "that found how Sen. Obama's support among working, hard-working Americans, white Americans, is weakening again, and how whites in both states who had not completed college were supporting me."

"There's a pattern emerging here," said Hillary. "These are the people you have to win if you're a Democrat in sufficient numbers to actually win the election. Everybody knows that."

The Democratic Party can't win with just "eggheads and African-Americans," Paul Begala added helpfully.

What Hillary and Begala are saying is politically incorrect, but it is also patently true.

-----

In 40 years, two Democrats have won the presidency, Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton, and both did so only after connecting with these folks.

People forget. In 1976, Carter ran as a Naval Academy grad and nuclear engineer, a born-again Baptist and peanut farmer from Plains, Ga., who, in Philadelphia, talked about preserving the "ethnic purity" of the neighborhoods. Clinton first ran as a death-penalty Democrat.


-----

McCain, a war hero and POW, is a natural for Middle Pennsylvania and Middle Ohio. His problems, however, are these:

He is failing to energize the Republican base, one-fourth of which is still voting against him in primaries. On the great populist issues of 2008 -- outsourcing of American jobs to Mexico, Asia and China, and the illegal alien invasion -- he stands foursquare with K Street -- for amnesty and NAFTA -- and against Main Street.

And like Gerald Ford and Bob Dole, McCain recoils from cultural and social issues. He berated Tarheel Republicans for linking Barack, the Rev. Wright and local Democrats, and denounced a conservative talk show host who introduced him for mocking Barack's middle name. (This is a reminder for those who believe that McCain will "slaughter" his opponent in the general debate).

This may solidify McCain's standing with his core constituency, the liberal commentariat. But these folks will depart in the fall. And the Republican base and the Hillary Democrats had better be there, or McCain will do what moderate Republicans nominees do best. Lose gracefully.

Exactly.

Anyway, feel free to disagree. Me, I think Pat is right on track, for once.

Kathy30
05-09-2008, 10:01 AM
If the obamination can get away with not mentioning race (because everyone else does) McCain doesn't need to point out the obamination's obvious warts and moles. It doesn't mean that no one will.

Suzie
05-09-2008, 10:34 AM
If the obamination can get away with not mentioning race (because everyone else does) McCain doesn't need to point out the obamination's obvious warts and moles. It doesn't mean that no one will.
I agree. He doesn't need to go after him for media circus events. The very fact that he "condemns" these things only draws more attention to it, because people want to see what he's condemning and it gets played twice as much and twice as long as it would have if they just kept trading barbs. This has worked brilliantly so far. It get's play for they first run because the media sees it as a problem ... McCain condemns making an issue of it, then they run it more to show everyone what he's condemning. Even that thing in NC where it just would have been something aired locally got national air play because McCain condemned it. It's working to his advantage 3 fold.

Obama's lack of experience and where he stands on the issues without being able to give a rational perspective on how he plans to accomplish his pipe dreams will be the reason McCain can will blow him away in any debate.

That won't thrill the people who love name calling and tantrums for drawing attention or trying to make a sale, but if McCain does that many people will call him out and start screaming "temper" again.

Lazarus
05-09-2008, 02:05 PM
I'm not a Buchanan fan, not by a long chalk. But I think he's got something here....Anyway, feel free to disagree. Me, I think Pat is right on track, for once.I'm with you Maggie... I think Pat is on to sumpin...

Although right now, with the bloody war going on in the Dem ranks, its hard to tell how this election will turn out...

But Pat's analysis of his weakness on the Pub side is right on target... Rush stated it clearer the other day... He said that his biggest challenge in this election is to convince Conservative voters to vote for McCain... And he's right... Because Rush has a long road before convincing me to back this Leftist Wolf in Conservative clothing...

Maggie_T
05-09-2008, 09:12 PM
Absolutely.

I heard it on TV today that McCain's mom said he was such a nice, sweet baby. Oh, really? How cute. However, we're not electing the Next Gerber Baby Model, we're electing president of the most powerful country in the world. The job requires balls, not dimples. I suspect that McCain has more of the second than the first.

And I certainly won't be one of those accusing McCain of "temper" if he blows the demunist candidate - whoever that may be - out of the water. That's the only time McCain SHOULD show temper.

I somehow doubt it, though.