Personal Loans | Mobile Phones | Advertising | Adverse Credit Remortgage | Loans
Canadian Pastor sentenced to silence. [Archive] - FreeConservatives

PDA

View Full Version : Canadian Pastor sentenced to silence.


CONSERVATIVE HERO
06-10-2008, 07:42 AM
Those who "don't effect anyone else" strike again. (http://ezralevant.com/2008/06/what-could-mark-steyns-punishm.html?CFID=1103384&CFTOKEN=47df134fb8048200-7276C0E2-CE70-5A24-6E5C0684D1BFEB1B) Pastor forbidden from criticizing extinctionists.

From email:
David Ben Gurion, the first Israeli Prime Minister, once said, "The test of democracy is freedom of criticism." Nowhere have politicians more miserably failed that test than in Alberta, Canada, where the gatekeepers of political correctness--the Human Rights Commission (HRC)--have sentenced a pastor to a lifetime of silence. The case was initiated in 2002, when Rev. Stephen Boissoin published letters to the editor opposing same-sex "marriage" in the Red Deer Advocate. At the time, Canada was embroiled in a debate over whether to legalize counterfeit marriage across the country. When Professor Darren Lund of Calgary read Boissoin's editorials, he filed a complaint with the Alberta HRC, alleging that the content of the articles was "hateful." The Commission appointed a tribunal to investigate Boissoin, led by an unelected bureaucrat Lori Andreachuk. Last November, Andreachuk found Boissoin guilty of discrimination and, without the benefit of his testimony, forbade him from uttering "anything disparaging about homosexuals." Notice that Andreachuk does not ban him from speaking about anything "illegal" but bars him from any negativity toward gays and lesbians. The official punishment, issued without so much as a public hearing, includes everything from personal emails to congregational sermons. As if the lifetime speech ban were not tyrannical enough, Andreachuk also ordered Boissoin to compensate Professor Lund, who was not a victim of the so-called "hate crime," $5,000. Under the terms of his sentencing, the Reverend must "cease publishing...remarks about homosexuals" and submit a written apology to Lund for publication in the Red Deer Advocate. Ezra Levant, who is under similar scrutiny for printing cartoons about Mohammed, notes in a new column, "[Boissoin] has to publicly humiliate himself, by publicly declaring his contrition--a contrition he does not feel--and his abandonment of his deeply-held religious beliefs... Does that happen anywhere outside of Communist China?" Conservatives across Canada are in an uproar over the ruling and many are demanding that Premier Ed Stelmach follow through with his promise to review the unbridled "censorship powers" of the HRC. If he refuses, Alberta's thought police can indict any pastor or average citizen who holds political or moral views contrary to the powers-that-be.

DeclinetoState
06-10-2008, 08:02 AM
By Ezra Levant on June 6, 2008 4:50 PM | Permalink (http://ezralevant.com/2008/06/what-could-mark-steyns-punishm.html) | Comments (148) | Trackback<br>
See update, below.

What could Mark Steyn's punishment look like, if he's convicted by the B.C. Human Rights Tribunal?

It could look like this order (http://albertahumanrights.ab.ca/Lund_Darren_Remedy053008.pdf), issued just last week by Alberta's human rights commission, against a Christian pastor named Rev. Stephen Boission (http://www.stephenboissoin.com/). (The substantive ruling against Rev. Boissoin can be found here (http://albertahumanrights.ab.ca/LundDarren113007Pa.pdf). See paragraph 357 where the right not to be offended "trumps the freedom of speech afforded in the Charter." And see a thoughtful response by the former executive director of the gay rights lobby, EGALE, here (http://www.egale.ca/index.asp?lang=E&menu=12&item=1245).)

<table border="0"><tr><td width="15%">http://ezralevant.com/loriandreachuk.jpg</td><td>The kangaroo court judge in this case is a Tory patronage appointee, a divorce lawyer from Lethbridge named Lori Andreachuk (http://alumni.uleth.ca/alumni/inductees/2003/andreachuk.shtml), (pictured at left). That's her expertise: divorce law. Not constitutional law; not freedom of speech or freedom of religion. And it shows.<br>
Last November, she convicted Boissoin. Last week she ordered her "remedy".

It is the most revolting order I have ever seen in Canada. Ever.

I'll excerpt a few lines from her ruling (http://albertahumanrights.ab.ca/Lund_Darren_Remedy053008.pdf):</td></tr></table>
In this case, there is no specific individual who can be compensated as there is no direct victim who has come forward...
More (http://ezralevant.com/2008/06/what-could-mark-steyns-punishm.html)

Timberwolf
06-10-2008, 11:40 AM
See paragraph 357 where the right not to be offended "trumps the freedom of speech afforded in the Charter."But, but, but...what if the ruling offends the pastor? Does the HR Commission's "right" to free speech get trumped by the Pastor's "right" not to be offended? And then, aren't they right back to square one?

DesertFox
06-10-2008, 11:56 AM
What an outrage.

CH, it's "affect," not "effect."

Riverboat
06-10-2008, 01:44 PM
CH, it's "affect," not "effect."Maybe she wants to punish folks for not putting others in motion.

DoctorDoom
06-10-2008, 02:11 PM
But, but, but...what if the ruling offends the pastor? Not an issue. In Canada, it's not only acceptable but laudable to offend Christians.

DesertFox
06-10-2008, 02:20 PM
America too, I'm afraid.

DeclinetoState
06-11-2008, 12:42 AM
The kangaroo court judge in this case is a Tory patronage appointee . . .The Tories are the Progressive Conservatives, the closest thing Canada has to Republicans (or RINOs).