Blog Hosting Sites | Libros | Online Advertising | iPhone Reviews | Mortgages
(Supreme) Court OK's border fence despite environmental worry [Archive] - FreeConservatives

PDA

View Full Version : (Supreme) Court OK's border fence despite environmental worry


HomeschoolrsRUs
06-25-2008, 09:17 AM
Court OK's border fence despite environmental worry (http://apnews.myway.com/article/20080623/D91G293G0.html)

WASHINGTON (AP) - The Supreme Court said Monday it won't stand in the way as the U.S. extends its security fence hundreds of miles along the border with Mexico, allowing building to proceed full-speed despite claims that it harms the environment and animals who live in the area.

DeclinetoState
06-25-2008, 09:31 AM
. . . claims that it harms the environment and animals who live in the area.Whoever wrote that should be ashamed of themselves. Insinuating that undocumented immigrants are animals is beyond the pale.

:evilgrin:

DoctorDoom
06-25-2008, 09:45 AM
The fact that it will keep out dangerous animals more than compensates foir the inconvenience to the quadrupedal kind. But speaking of the environment, it costs millions of dollars to clean this up after the wetbacks move on.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v349/DocDoom777/International/IllegalsTrash1.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v349/DocDoom777/International/IllegalsTrash2.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v349/DocDoom777/International/IllegalTrash3.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v349/DocDoom777/International/IllegalTrash4.jpg

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/gF2ulNqATs8&hl=en"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/gF2ulNqATs8&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

Tell us again how the fence endangers the environment, ecowackos.

Maggie_T
06-25-2008, 10:16 AM
Ok, I have a question for eco-nazis (and I know you're out there, browsing).

You're all staunch Darwinists, aren't you? Right.

So. Why all the hysterics about animals not surviving walls, oil drillings, etc.? According to his theory, Darwin stated that only the fittest of the species would survive. Which means, that if these animals don't survive progress (the real progress, that is; not the mockery of it you believe in) it's because they are not fit to do so. So let the perish and let a new species develop.

I mean, if algae became fish, and then birds, and then a T-Rex, and then Jimmy Carter, why would you not believe in a species that adapts to progress? Who knows? Maybe drilling for oil will be the beginning of a species that shits oil. And then all we would have to do it collect the shit, and everybody would be happy.

What? You're going to tell me now that Darwinism is only valid as an excuse to deny the existence of God? You're going to tell me that it doesn't work anymore? In that case, it should not be taught in schools anymore, should it? If - according to you, like the Bible and the Constitutiom - Darwinism is an obsolete theory, then why bother with it at all?

Let progress ring. And a new species develop.

DesertFox
06-25-2008, 10:38 AM
The Supreme Court said Monday it won't stand in the way Well, now! Ain't that kind of the Supreme Court?

Who are these Kwame Nkrumah wannabes, anyhow?

DeclinetoState
06-25-2008, 11:28 AM
After looking at Doc's post below mine, I'm almost ready to withdraw my comment. Perhaps the writer of the article was on to something . . .

MaximumSam
06-25-2008, 11:41 AM
So. Why all the hysterics about animals not surviving walls, oil drillings, etc.? According to his theory, Darwin stated that only the fittest of the species would survive. Which means, that if these animals don't survive progress (the real progress, that is; not the mockery of it you believe in) it's because they are not fit to do so. So let the perish and let a new species develop.


I suppose we "Darwinists" still feel we have a moral responsibility not to randomly kill entire species for little reason.

oldcoastie
06-25-2008, 11:51 AM
Survival of our country is not a "little reason?"

HomeschoolrsRUs
06-25-2008, 11:53 AM
I suppose we "Darwinists" still feel we have a moral responsibility not to randomly kill entire species for little reason.

Nope, you advocate it.. "Darwinists" are the ones responsible for Roe V. Wade.

Maggie_T
06-25-2008, 12:16 PM
What Oldcastie and Homes said.

Sham, nice try, but no cigar for you. Illegal immigration threatens everything this country is about: our culture, our values, our national security.

Oil dependency does pretty much the same thing, especially where national securiy is concerned.

Your excuse that we kill entire species for "little reason" is fraudulent, exaggerated, and it merely shows your irresponsible ignorance, as well as your absolute incompetence in making the case for environmentalism.

About time you people started looking for a better excuse than that of "killing entire species" (excepting human babies, of course). That one has been blown out of the water too often to hold any credibility whatsoever.

MaximumSam
06-25-2008, 12:18 PM
Nope, you advocate it.. "Darwinists" are the ones responsible for Roe V. Wade.

I'm not aware that that human beings are endangered, or that "Darwinists" had anything to do with Roe v. Wade.

DeclinetoState
06-25-2008, 12:21 PM
Sam's right. It was those right-wing creationist fundamentalist Christian types who handed down Roe v. Wade.

{Note to uninitiated: the above is an example of sarcasm.}

Neil Peart
06-25-2008, 12:22 PM
Sam's right. It was those right-wing creationist fundamentalist Christian types who handed down Roe v. Wade.Don't forget racist, homophobic, and bigoted.

MaximumSam
06-25-2008, 12:22 PM
Sham, nice try, but no cigar for you. Illegal immigration threatens everything this country is about: our culture, our values, our national security.


No doubt, a fence will save the country from the dishwasher at Applebees.

Maggie_T
06-25-2008, 12:26 PM
THAT is the best argument you can come up with?!

You see? I said you are ignorant and incapable of making a case, and you rushed to prove me right. Sporting of you, mate.

DeclinetoState
06-25-2008, 12:28 PM
No doubt, a fence will save the country from the dishwasher at Applebees.Red herring.

MaximumSam
06-25-2008, 12:33 PM
Sam's right. It was those right-wing creationist fundamentalist Christian types who handed down Roe v. Wade.

Isn't Norma McCorvey a fundamentalist christian?

Maggie_T
06-25-2008, 12:33 PM
Of course, it is a red herring, Decline. But that's the only thing liberals can come up with when trying to defend their idiotic cases.

Maggie_T
06-25-2008, 12:34 PM
Isn't Norma McCorvey a fundamentalist christian?

What the hell has that to do with anything?

Maggie_T
06-25-2008, 12:37 PM
As the plaintiff behind the Roe v. Wade Supreme Court case, Norma McCorvey became known as the poster child for the pro-choice movement. But underneath she led a life of drug and alcohol addiction as she increasingly felt alienated by the wealthy and famous elements of the pro-choice crowd. Then to make matters worse, her worst enemy, the pro-life group Operation Rescue, moved in next door to her clinic.Norma's story is a heartwarming tale of how Christians from Operation Rescue -- led by a seven-year-old girl named Emily -- banded together to break through even the hardest of hearts. Few expected that a woman who once told a reporter that she "lived and breathed" for abortion would one day walk next door, give her life to Jesus, and begin working for the people she once hated. Won by Love not only reveals the shocking, inside machinations of the abortion industry, but also reveals an inspiring tale of how God uses love to mold hearts to His service.

http://bks9.books.google.com/books?id=iyANAAAACAAJ&printsec=frontcover&img=1&zoom=1&sig=ACfU3U2NKP5M9uI7uSiYT1VWl2X6QGg30A This is the book she wrote about her conversion to pro-life.







LINK (http://books.google.com/books?id=iyANAAAACAAJ&dq=inauthor:Norma+inauthor:McCorvey&ei=2YFiSJiqApK6tQOX0KXOBQ)

Sham, are you really that stupid, or are you just trying to be obnoxious?

Lazarus
06-25-2008, 12:40 PM
... Who knows? Maybe drilling for oil will be the beginning of a species that shits oil. :rotflmbo: Get em Maggie Baby!!!

And then all we would have to do it collect the shit, and everybody would be happy.Wrongo, Maggie... Not everyone would be happy...

All those Communists who ran and disquised themselves as Enviro-nazis after the Soviet Union fell, who's agenda is to fake concern for the Environment in order to bring down the United States, will NEVER EVER be happy until America is crushed and its people are put in cages...

A gold-shitting critter would not make these thugs happy...

Maggie_T
06-25-2008, 12:42 PM
I was being flippant, love. Of course, commies will never be happy unless they get total control over the population's life and mind.

Absolute power and control is the only thing that makes lefties happy.

Beowulf
06-25-2008, 03:17 PM
No doubt, a fence will save the country from the dishwasher at Applebees.

Kinda weak, Sam. Your statement validates something I've been saying all along about "jobs that Americans won't do." If our elected officials had any balls, they would deny any employment of illegals and force people riding the welfare system into taking jobs as dishwashers, vegetable pickers and the like. If they refuse, cut em' off. I'm sick of Washington's pandering of Mexico. As it is, you never answered my old question of "Why should we have one immigration standard for Mexico and a different one for the rest-of-the-world?" Apparently you have a problem with screening people who want to immigrate here to make sure they aren't criminals and will be good citizens. Australia and New Zealand do just that yet no one criticizes them.

As far as the SCOTUS decision goes, good form. Now let's see if the rest of Washington takes advantage although I doubt they will.

Kathy30
06-25-2008, 03:50 PM
No doubt, a fence will save the country from the dishwasher at Applebees.

That dishwasher at Applebees spreads disease because he wipes his ass with his hands, then washes your dishes in the e-coli water. He also moonlights as a home invasion robber with a few friends of his.

But, that's not the reason we need the fence. We need the fence because a few blocks across the border 41 people were killed in four fun filled days by narco gunmen battling for control of the government.

Maggie_T
06-25-2008, 04:17 PM
Besides, the fence might not solve the problem of the existing dishwasher at Applebees, but it will prevent other illegals from becoming dishwashers anywhere else.

Sham is just being his simplistic, knee-jerk illegals defending old self.

DeclinetoState
06-25-2008, 08:15 PM
Originally Posted by MaximumSam
Isn't Norma McCorvey a fundamentalist christian?What the hell has that to do with anything?
McCorvey may be a fundamentalist "christian" (as MaxiSam styles it) now, but she wasn't at the time of Roe v. Wade. My suggestion that fundamentalist Christians gave us Roe v. Wade was meant as sarcasm. Sam tried to turn it around. As you can see, Maggie, it was with only very limited success.

Maggie_T
06-26-2008, 11:02 AM
Oh, agreed. He acted like the typical liberal-painted-into-a-corner: lashed out the first thing that came to his mind (term used loosely). You know. Like the typical kid who's losing a fight with other kids and all he can think of is screaming "You ... you ... you poo-poo head!"

DoctorDoom
06-26-2008, 08:07 PM
Sham is and always has been a hyperliberal troll. He does not discuss or debate because he cannot do so. He is here for one purpose only: to annoy conservatives. It was pleasant when he took a long break from polluting FC with his troill turds. One wishes that his absence had been indefinitely extended.

As for his deference to the wetbacks ...

Regardless, the issue raised, I think, is important. I work with lots of illegal aliens charged with crimes.My Faith Being Tested, post #52 (http://www.freeconservatives.com/vb/showpost.php?p=669334&postcount=52)

Sam the troll has a vested interest in Mexicriminals.

Maggie_T
06-26-2008, 09:24 PM
Like charged with killing and raping women, or driving UTI when they should not be driving at all, much less w/o a license?

Oh, but those are not crimes according to illegal aliens-apologists like Sham. They are poor, you see. They should be accomodated in every way.

And people still ask me why I feel such disgust and contempt for lefties, a.k.a. liberals. :sulk: