McCain assailed for opposing adoptions by "gays"

[Suzie]

McCain assailed for opposing adoptions by gays

<!-- BEGIN STORY BODY --> By DAVID CRARY, AP National Writer 2 hours, 10 minutes ago

<!-- end storyhdr --> NEW YORK - Advocates for gay and lesbian parents are denouncing Sen. John McCain, an adoptive father himself, for opposing adoptions by gays, which prompted his presidential campaign to clarify Tuesday that he does not seek a federal ban on the practice.



MORE HERE (http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080716/ap_on_el_pr/mccain_gay_adoptions;_ylt=AiC.YfcN63tkSbxop_zjOLKs 0NUE)

States rights. :thumb:

[Taylor1]

I oppose it too. I've made it clear, I'm not against them being married, but wanting kids.. taking it too far.

[DoctorDoom]

Queers "marrying" is as repugnant as queers adopting. If the one is permitted, there is no argument against the other.

[HomeschoolrsRUs]

Queers "marrying" is as repugnant as queers adopting. If the one is permitted, there is no argument against the other.

Exactly.

[DeclinetoState]

I'm waiting for the day when two people, both born of the same sex, can mate and produce a kid biologically (no artificial insemination or third-party egg or sperm donors). When that happens . . . well, adoption will be pretty much moot, no?

[DesertFox]

Naw. This sick era of history will pass.

[Maggie_T]

Not before vast damage has been done to society because of it.

[Wolfcounsel]

"I oppose it too. I've made it clear, I'm not against them being married, but wanting kids.. taking it too far." --Taylor1

You don't mind two fruits corrupting the law of God regarding marriage?

[Longhorn_Platinum]

:unsmile: I've never understood the need for homosexual "marriage". Isn't marriage supposed to exist so two lovers can... *ahem* ...come together without sinning before God? If the two lovers are both of the same gender, didn't God forbid them from "coming together", so aren't they sinning, anyway? So what's the point?

[DoctorDoom]

"Coming together", queer-style.

<center><img src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v349/DocDoom777/Anim%20GIF/ATT00020.gif" />

<img src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v349/DocDoom777/Anim%20GIF/ATT00021.gif" /></center>

[Taylor1]

Homosexual marriage and the bible confuses me :confused:

[DoctorDoom]

The Bible does not specifically forbid queer "marriage" because such a concept would have been unthinkable in those days. However, it does specifically condemn queer "sex".

[Wolfcounsel]

"Homosexual marriage and the bible confuses me :confused:" --Taylor1

Okay. Leave the Bible aside. There are other religions who do not use the Bible for marriage. Every single religion, and I am not referring to the monkey branches like Nude Lesbians of Hinduism, that spring from the trunk, every single religion talks about heterosexual marriage.

You do know what coitus is, don't you? Treat marriage the same way, and you will see "homo marriages" are purely masturbatory baloney.

[Maggie_T]

You guys. :rolleyes:

Same sex marriage has NOTHING to do with religion. It has to do with getting rid of religion. And for that, libbiots have to demolish all religious principles and laws. Separation of church and state, remember? That was the first step.

Remember also, that libbiots consider Christianity a religion of hate. Hatred against women (because it's anti-abortion), and hatred against homosexuals (it condemns same-sex marriage). So when you talk about homosexuality and sinning, libbiots immediately retort with "Oh, but that's YOUR religion, and you have NO right to impose it on others! Separation of church and state! Separation of church and state!"

It's all in order to get rid of religion. Christian religion, that is.

[Wolfcounsel]

"Same sex marriage has NOTHING to do with religion." --Maggie_T

According to the fruits and their cheerleaders, no. But marriage requires a man and a woman joining together and becoming one flesh, as God said. Homo "marriage" needs to be called Homo Mutual Masturbation Team, because that is all the queers can do with each other, and they dare call that sex. Well, them barring religion, why do they want the states to recognize a lawful union for whacking the monkeys?