The 21st Century Joan of Arc

[Rebam98]

The 21st Century Joan of Arc

August 18, 2003


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Amber Pawlik

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Feminism became popular beginning in 1963 by appealing to the best within Americans. It appealed to women’s desire for independence and achievement, and men’s desire to see them succeed. Americans naively, like a baby with a lollipop, allowed it to enter their lives.

But the real motive behind second wave feminism was corrupt in nature. And feminists continue to lose their pretty packaging, revealing themselves for the beasts they are, and in fact, always were.

Let us look at feminist behavior, and see if we can determine their motives and goals.

If promoting strong females were your goal, as feminist’s claim is their goal, would you not look for popular examples of successful females, so girls could look up to and strive to emulate them? Condoleeza Rice comes to mind as a strong role model for young girls.

http://mensnewsdaily.com/archive/p/pawlik/pawlik081803.htm

[Chris]

[ QUOTE ]
The characteristics needed for success are universal. It doesn’t matter if you are a man or a woman – a commitment to excellence, reason, discipline, enterprise etc. are necessary to do great things.

In the two opposite sides of statism and freedom, it is the people who believe in freedom who will aspire to greatness. Not desiring protectionism, they thus develop talent and value. Feminists, who don’t believe in being great, stifle a woman’s intellectual, moral, and economic development.

[/ QUOTE ]

Right on the money.


[ QUOTE ]
Can you name any great woman who was produced from feminist culture? By great, I mean a woman who painted a great painting; invented a great invention; led a great nation. I don’t mean women who are nothing but political mouthpieces or got where they are at through their husbands.

[/ QUOTE ]

Nope, feminists just aren't wired for real greatness. They are societal parasites, nothing more.


[ QUOTE ]
Betty Friedan, who wrote the book The Feminist Mystique, published in 1963, is credited with starting the women’s liberation movement. Her book started the entire revolution of women who wanted more than simple lives as housewives. Betty Friedan was a member of the Communist Party of the United States of America.

Feminism rode in on the boat of strong women, but that boat was infested rats – communist rats.

[/ QUOTE ]

As I said, parasites.


[ QUOTE ]
They may have won the public over by presenting the image of the strong woman, but from the very beginning they had the intent of ushering socialism into America on the back of chivalry and “women’s rights.” They had no interest in watching women succeed; they were interested, primarily, in removing women from the wife/mother role.

More recent feminist activism, from the Cuntfest at Penn State to supporting Andrea Yates are not a product of radicals who stole feminism, but a product of a movement that cannot cover its true nature anymore.

[/ QUOTE ]

As Hillary illustrates for us daily.


[ QUOTE ]
All rational people should reject such irrational notions as “women’s rights,” or rather – feminism. Collectivism and individualism cannot exist in the same place.

[/ QUOTE ]

The tentacles of collectivism pervades our society through more than just femisim though. It needs to be soundly rejected on all fronts.

[nosferatuscoffin]

More recent feminist activism, from the Cuntfest at Penn State to supporting Andrea Yates are not a product of radicals who stole feminism, but a product of a movement that cannot cover its true nature anymore.

Wow. If I had said that, I wold be drummed out of town. Glad that most women understand that the Feminazis are nothing more than a bunch of penis-envy bitches that no man, drunk or sober, would ever sleep with.