Canadian deals | Credit Counseling | Myspace Layouts | Mortgages | Credit Card
Many Who Serve Not Legally Vets [Archive] - FreeConservatives

PDA

View Full Version : Many Who Serve Not Legally Vets


oracle
04-22-2002, 01:27 PM
Many Who Serve Not Legally Vets (http://www.ctnow.com/news/local/hc-whosavet0421.artapr21.story?coll=hc%2Dhea)

April 21, 2002

By OSHRAT CARMIEL, Courant Staff Writer


George Keller enlisted in the Army at 19 and became a member of the 82nd Airborne Division, where he earned a parachutist badge and the tattooed insignia for "America's Guard of Honor."

He served from 1959 to 1962: three years, two months and thirteen days, his discharge papers show.

But decades later, when Keller was living in a car and dying of a debilitating heart disease, he was denied admission to the state Veterans Home and Hospital.

The reason? He was not a veteran.

At least not in the eyes of Connecticut state law, one of the most restrictive in the country in how it rewards military service with practical state benefits.

Under state law, veterans are defined as only those who served in the military during a time of war for at least 90 days. So anyone stationed in Kuwait during Desert Storm or servicing a plane in Italy at the same time would be eligible. But anyone who served during peacetime - no matter how long - is not eligible to receive state benefits, which include admission to the veterans' home in Rocky Hill, tuition reimbursement at state schools, property tax exemptions and burial in state veterans' cemeteries.

Keller's service began after the end of the Korean War and overlapped with the beginning of what the state recognizes as the Vietnam War period. But when he was discharged on March 18, 1962, he had served only 86 of his days in a period of war, four days short of what he needed to get into the veterans home and to be buried with an honor guard in a veterans' cemetery.

"Here's a guy who served for three years," said Peter N. McMullen, a nurse at the Newington VA hospital who worked with Keller. "He's four days shy and the state says he's not a veteran."

Estranged from his family and owning nothing more than a shaving kit and a leather coat, Keller, of East Windsor, died in 1999, living out his final days at the East Hartford Community Shelter. Managers there allowed him to stay for a year, despite the shelter policy that no client can stay for more than three months.

"I wasn't going to let him die on the street. I wasn't going to let that happen," said Kymberly Lessard, the shelter's program manager. "He was dying and he had no place to go."

Keller is an extreme example of what advocates for veterans say is an unfair caste system in Connecticut that rewards service only when it coincides with war, a standard that no veteran can control.

"Everyone who joins the military raises their right hand and they all take the same oath to defend the Constitution," said Jim Tackett, director of the HealthCare for Homeless Veterans program at the West Haven VA Hospital. "Those who serve honorably, fulfill their duty and are discharged honorably - they're veterans."

...


Click here to read more (http://www.ctnow.com/news/local/hc-whosavet0421.artapr21.story?coll=hc%2Dhea)

Desertrat06
04-22-2002, 03:09 PM
I've always had mixed emotions about this "Veteran" thing. I've watched similar sad situations through several decades...

My father and step-father both were in combat during WW II. However, I entered the Army after the Truce was signed in Korea, and served there merely on Occupation Duty.

Due to technicalities of Law, I got the Korean GI Bill. I was invalided out of the Army with TB, and thus got VA disability.

But, I've just never really thought of myself as a "Veteran".

'Rat

**DONOTDELETE**
04-22-2002, 03:12 PM
What an outrage that this sort of thing happens, while illegal aliens, at the time this man died, were getting free hospitalization, medicines, transplants (!!!!), free public education, public housing, legal aid, and what have you. What a damn, dirty shame!

SunnyBrook
04-22-2002, 04:52 PM
We were discussing this issue with an elderly friend just today. He served in WWII in the Merchant Marines. He was in the Pacific during the Okinawa invasion, etc. Until recently, he wasn't considered a veteran and wasn't eligible for any benefits.


SunnyBrook

**DONOTDELETE**
04-22-2002, 05:26 PM
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Desertrat06:
I've always had mixed emotions about this "Veteran" thing. I've watched similar sad situations through several decades...

My father and step-father both were in combat during WW II. However, I entered the Army after the Truce was signed in Korea, and served there merely on Occupation Duty.

Due to technicalities of Law, I got the Korean GI Bill. I was invalided out of the Army with TB, and thus got VA disability.

But, I've just never really thought of myself as a "Veteran".

'Rat<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

You have no choice if there is a war we are in or not.

If you serve honorably you are a veteran. You are not a combat vet, but you ARe a vet. You wore the uniform, you served your country.
It is that simple.

I graduated high school in 1979. Went into the USAF then. Got out in 1986, because they had given my wife orders to the UK, and my squadron commander would not approve orders for me. I got out as a Ssgt.

There was no war during that time, unless you count Grenada, but I blinked and missed it.

Does this make me less of a vet?
I served honorably for almost 7 years.

Yet by Ct. standards I would not be a vet.

**DONOTDELETE**
04-22-2002, 05:48 PM
Connecticut can bite me, along with any apologists from there. No smiley either.