Personal Finance | Debt Management | Pay Day Loans | Charity | Free Online Games
Subject: Federal Bill 602P-Mail Charge [Archive] - FreeConservatives

PDA

View Full Version : Subject: Federal Bill 602P-Mail Charge


Pennville_Bill
03-13-2004, 08:10 AM
Guess the warnings were true. Federal Bill 602P charges 5-cents per E-mail sent. It figures! No more free E-mail! We knew this was coming!! Bill 602P will permit the Federal Government to charge a 5-cent charge on every delivered E-mail.

Please read the following carefully if you intend to stay online and continue using E-mail. The last few months have revealed an alarming trend in the Government of the United States attempting to quietly push through legislation that will affect our use of the Internet.

Under proposed legislation, the US Postal Service will be attempting to bill E-mail users out of "alternative postage fees."

Bill 602P will permit the Federal Government to charge a 5-cent surcharge on every e-mail delivered, by billing Internet Service Providers at source. The consumer would then be billed in turn by the ISP. Washington, DC lawyer Richard Stepp is working without pay to prevent this legislation from becoming law.

The US Postal Service is claiming lost revenue, due to the proliferation of E-mail, is costing nearly $230,000,000 in revenue per year. You may have noticed their recent ad campaign: "There is nothing like a letter."

Since the average person received about 10 pieces of E-mail per day in
1998, the cost of the typical individual would be an additional 50 cents a day -- or over $180 per year -- above and beyond their regular Internet costs.

Note that this would be money paid directly to the US Postal Service for a service they do not even provide.

The whole point of the Internet is democracy and noninterference. You are already paying an exorbitant price for snail mail because of bureaucratic inefficiency. It currently takes up to 6 days for a letter to be delivered from coast to coast. If the US Postal Service is allowed to tinker with E-mail, it will mark the end of the "free" Internet in the United States.

Congressional representative, Tony Schnell (R) has even suggested a "$20-$40 per month surcharge on all Internet service" above and beyond the governments proposed E-mail charges. Note that most of the major newspapers have ignored the story the only exception being the Washingtonian which called the idea of E-mail surcharge "a useful concept who's time has come" (March 6th, 1999 Editorial). Do not sit by and watch your freedom erode away!

Send this E-mail to EVERYONE on your list, and tell all your friends and relatives to write their congressional representative and say "NO" to Bill 602P.

It will only take a few moments of your time and could very well be instrumental in killing a bill we do not want.

PLEASE FORWARD!

Thieving bastards - PB

DoctorDoom
03-13-2004, 08:19 AM
This is a hoax that has been around for several years.

Bill 602P (http://www.snopes.com/business/taxes/bill602p.asp)

[ QUOTE ]
The whole thing is bunk. There is no Congressman named Tony Schnell; no Bill 602P (Congressional bill designations begin with either H.R. or S., depending upon whether they're House or Senate bills); no law firm of Berger, Stepp and Gorman; no such address as 216 Concorde Street in Vienna, Virginia; and no editorial in The Washingtonian. This hoax actually began with a Canadian version that was later Americanized.

[/ QUOTE ]

DesertFox
03-13-2004, 08:21 AM
Dang it. There goes an otherwise perfectly good reason for exploding in paroxysms of rage.

DoctorDoom
03-13-2004, 08:25 AM
Not a problem. There will be a plethora of them before November.

Warlady
03-13-2004, 09:01 AM
Boy is this thing still going? All bills start with an H for House or S for Senate. There is no such thing as a P bill. I thought the whole world knew about this ho-axe.

DoctorDoom
03-13-2004, 09:27 AM
The politically savvy can see through it in an instant. The average Web user is a sucker for this nonsense.

oracle
03-13-2004, 12:49 PM
Yep, but unfortunately Microsoft has decided that it is a good idea and the way to eliminate spam (and of course for them to make money off of all hotmail users).